• Home
  • /
  • Blog
  • /
  • The Basics of Insurance Claims Adjustment

by Mike Vestil 

The Basics of Insurance Claims Adjustment

Contents hide

In this article, readers will learn about the various facets of insurance claims adjustment, including the role of insurance adjusters, the different types of claims, and the claims adjustment process. Additionally, the article discusses useful tips for negotiating with insurance adjusters and understanding policy coverage.

To help readers who may face disputes or appeals, the piece offers an insight into the dispute resolution and appeals process along with methods to address underpayment and insurance fraud. This comprehensive guide serves as a valuable resource for individuals looking to navigate the complex world of insurance claims and achieve fair settlements.

Understanding Insurance Claims Adjustment

The role of an Insurance Adjuster

An insurance adjuster, also known as a claims adjuster, claims handler or loss adjuster, is a professional responsible for investigating insurance claims on behalf of an insurance company. Their primary responsibility is to determine the extent of the insurer’s financial liability for a claim and to facilitate the settlement of valid claims in a fair and efficient manner.

Insurance adjusters assess the damage, determine if the claim falls within the scope of the policy, and negotiate with the claimant to reach a settlement if the claim is deemed valid.

Types of Insurance Claims Adjusters

There are three main types of insurance claims adjusters:

  1. Staff Adjusters: These adjusters are employed directly by the insurance company and handle claims for their employer exclusively. They are paid a salary and typically receive benefits and bonuses as part of their compensation.

  2. Independent Adjusters: These adjusters are not employed by an insurance company but work on a contract basis for multiple insurance companies. They are hired by insurers as needed to manage the influx of claims during busy periods or when there is a need for specialized expertise. Independent adjusters are paid on a per-claim or a per-day basis.

  3. Public Adjusters: Public adjusters are hired by policyholders instead of insurance companies. They represent the claimant’s interests during the claims process and work to ensure the claimant receives a fair and accurate settlement. Public adjusters are paid a percentage of the claim settlement, typically around 10%.

How the Claims Adjustment Process Works

The claims adjustment process involves several steps, including:

  1. Notification of loss: The policyholder contacts the insurance company to report a loss, such as an automobile accident, property damage, or illness.

  2. Assigning an adjuster: The insurance company assigns a claims adjuster to the case. In some instances, this may be a staff adjuster or an independent adjuster, depending on the claim’s complexity and the insurer’s available resources.

  3. Investigation: The claims adjuster conducts an investigation to gather relevant information, review policy documents, and determine the extent of the insurer’s liability. This may involve interviewing witnesses, obtaining police reports, and inspecting the damages.

  4. Evaluation: The adjuster evaluates the claim, confirms coverage, and calculates an appropriate settlement amount based on the policy’s terms and the damages incurred.

  5. Negotiation and settlement: The adjuster negotiates with the policyholder to reach a fair settlement. This may involve approving or denying the claim, negotiating a suitable payout, or referring the case to legal professionals if a resolution cannot be reached.

Various Types of Insurance Claims

Auto Insurance Claims

Auto insurance claims involve damages or injuries resulting from vehicular accidents or other covered incidents, such as theft or vandalism. Policyholders may seek compensation for vehicle repairs, medical expenses, and other damages incurred due to the incident.

Homeowners Insurance Claims

Homeowners insurance claims involve damages to the policyholder’s property, such as damage caused by fire, hail, floods, theft, and vandalism. Policyholders may seek compensation for repairs, replacement of personal belongings, and additional living expenses if they are displaced from their home.

Life Insurance Claims

Life insurance claims are filed after the death of the insured party. Beneficiaries must submit a death certificate and other required documentation to receive the policy’s death benefit.

Health Insurance Claims

Health insurance claims involve medical expenses incurred by the policyholder due to illness or injury. Policyholders or their medical providers submit claims for reimbursements or direct payments to cover treatment costs, prescriptions, and other medical expenses.

Commercial Insurance Claims

Commercial insurance claims involve losses incurred by businesses, such as property damage, liability claims, and business interruptions. Businesses may seek compensation for repairs, legal expenses, and other financial losses due to covered incidents.

Workers’ Compensation Claims

Workers’ compensation claims involve employees who have suffered a work-related illness or injury. Employees may seek compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages related to their injury.

Navigating the Claims Adjustment Process

Reporting a Claim

The first step in the claims adjustment process is reporting the claim. Policyholders should contact their insurance company as soon as possible after a covered incident occurs. This ensures the claim is filed within the required time frame as specified in the policy documents.

Documentation and Evidence Gathering

Policyholders should gather all relevant documentation and evidence to support their claim, such as medical bills, repair estimates, police reports, and photographs of the damage. Providing comprehensive documentation can help expedite the claims process and improve the chances of a favorable outcome.

The Adjuster’s Investigation

The assigned adjuster investigates the claim by reviewing the submitted documentation, visiting the site of the incident (if applicable), and gathering additional information through interviews, inspections, and expert opinions. This step helps the adjuster determine the extent of the insurer’s liability and the validity of the claim.

Evaluation of the Claim

After completing the investigation, the adjuster evaluates the claim in light of the policy’s terms, coverage limits, and deductibles. They will then calculate an appropriate settlement amount based on the damages sustained and any policy exclusions or limitations.

Determining Payout Amounts and Settlements

The adjuster negotiates with the policyholder to reach an agreed-upon settlement. If a fair settlement cannot be reached, the claim may be referred to arbitration or litigation. Once a settlement is reached and approved, the insurance company issues the payout to the policyholder, resolving the claim.

Negotiating with Insurance Adjusters

Insurance adjusters play a critical role in processing claims and determining the appropriate settlement for policyholders. As a claimant, it is essential to negotiate effectively with insurance adjusters to ensure that you receive a fair and reasonable settlement offer. In this article, we will discuss various tips and strategies when dealing with adjusters, as well as the common tactics used by adjusters to reduce claim payouts. Additionally, we will provide information on when it may be appropriate to consider legal representation during the negotiation process.

Understanding Your Policy and Coverage

The first step in negotiating with an insurance adjuster is to understand your insurance policy and the coverage provided. Be sure to review your policy language, declarations page, and any endorsements or riders that may apply. This will help you determine what is covered under your policy, any exclusions or limitations, and the limits on coverage. Knowing the specifics of your coverage and policy will keep you informed and ready to discuss your claim with the insurance adjuster.

In addition, it is essential to gather all documentation relevant to your claim, such as:

  • Police reports
  • Photos of the damages
  • Repair estimates
  • Medical records and bills (if applicable)
  • Income information (if claiming lost wages)

Having all necessary documentation organized and accessible will strengthen your arguments during the negotiation process and ensure that you can substantiate your claim.

Tips for Effective Negotiation

To effectively negotiate with an insurance adjuster, consider the following tips:

  • Be prepared: Have a thorough understanding of your policy, coverage, and the documentation supporting your claim.

  • Be patient: Insurance adjusters often have a high caseload, and the negotiation process may take time. Remain respectful and professional throughout the process.

  • Set a target settlement amount: Before initiating negotiations, determine the minimum amount you are willing to accept as a settlement based on your damages and losses.

  • Remain assertive: Confidently present your arguments and supporting evidence to the adjuster while maintaining a respectful tone.

  • Create a written record: Keep a record of all correspondence with the insurance adjuster, including emails, letters, and phone call summaries. This can help prevent potential disputes or misunderstandings.

Common Tactics Used by Adjusters

Insurance adjusters often employ various strategies to reduce claim payouts. Some common tactics include:

  • Delaying the process: Insurance adjusters may take excessive time to process paperwork, respond to communications, or request additional information in an attempt to wear down the claimant or delay the settlement.

  • Requesting unnecessary documentation: Adjusters may ask for additional documents or information that is not required to decide the claim.

  • Lowballing initial offers: Adjusters may provide a low initial settlement offer, expecting the claimant to negotiate for a higher amount. It is essential to counter with a reasonable settlement request supported by evidence and documentation.

  • Disputing liability: Insurance adjusters may argue that their policyholder is not liable for the damages incurred or that the claimant contributed to their own losses, either fully or partially.

When to Consider Legal Representation

In some cases, it may be appropriate to seek legal representation when negotiating with an insurance adjuster. Examples of such situations include:

  • Severe injuries or substantial property damage: A larger claim may require the expertise of an attorney to ensure a fair settlement is reached.

  • Disputed liability: If the adjuster contests liability or tries to shift blame onto the claimant, an attorney can help protect your interests and negotiate a fair outcome.

  • Low settlement offers: If the insurance adjuster refuses to provide a reasonable settlement offer, a lawyer can help build a strong case supported by evidence and increase the chance of a fair settlement.

  • Policy disputes: If there are disagreements regarding the interpretation or application of policy terms, a lawyer can help clarify and advocate for the proper and fair application of the policy language.

Ultimately, the decision to hire legal representation should be based on the complexity and facts of your specific case. When in doubt, seek the advice and guidance of an experienced attorney.

Dispute Resolution and Appeals

Dispute resolution and appeals processes are essential components of any organization or legal system. They provide mechanisms for addressing disagreements and conflicts between parties and ensure that disputes are managed fairly, efficiently, and in accordance with the relevant legal or policy framework. In this article, we will explore the various aspects of the dispute resolution and appeals processes, including internal appeals, external reviews, mediation and arbitration, and legal options for unresolved disputes.

Internal Appeals Process

An internal appeals process is a procedure within an organization or institution where a person can contest a decision or outcome that they believe was unfair, biased, or inconsistent with established policies or procedures. This process often serves as the first step for resolving disputes as it allows parties to address concerns and seek remedies within the context of the organization itself.

Internal appeals processes typically involve submitting a written request for review or reconsideration, outlining the reasons for the appeal and providing any relevant evidence or additional information. The appeal is then reviewed by a designated individual or committee within the organization, who will assess the merits of the case and determine whether the initial decision can be upheld or should be modified.

During an internal appeal, both parties may be given the opportunity to present their arguments and supporting evidence, and a decision is made based on the applicable policies or laws, as well as the facts of the case. The outcome of the internal appeal is usually communicated to both parties, and any corrective actions or remedies are implemented accordingly. This process can be beneficial in resolving disputes amicably within the organization, without involving external parties or legal proceedings.

External Review Process

If a dispute is not resolved through the internal appeals process or if the party remains dissatisfied with the outcome, they may choose to seek an external review. External review processes can involve governmental agencies, regulatory bodies, or independent third-party organizations that specialize in dispute resolution.

An external review typically involves a thorough examination of the case by these external entities, assessing the initial decision, the internal appeals process, and any additional relevant information. External reviewers operate independently and impartially, ensuring that the review process is fair and unbiased.

External reviews can result in various outcomes, including upholding the initial decision, suggesting modifications to the decision or the process, or recommending that the organization take specific corrective actions. The external review process is crucial in providing an additional layer of accountability and fairness for organizations and individuals involved in disputes.

Mediation and Arbitration

In some cases, parties may choose to explore alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation and arbitration, to resolve their disagreements. Mediation is a voluntary, informal process where the parties involved work with a neutral third-party mediator to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. The mediator’s role is to facilitate communication and negotiation between the parties, rather than to make a binding decision.

Arbitration, on the other hand, is a more formal process where an impartial arbitrator, or a panel of arbitrators, makes a binding decision on a dispute. The parties involved agree in advance to accept the arbitrator’s decision as final, and the arbitration process is typically governed by a specific set of rules and procedures.

Both mediation and arbitration can be faster and less expensive than traditional litigation, and they can provide more flexible and tailored solutions to conflicts. These ADR methods allow parties to resolve disputes in a less adversarial manner and may lead to more satisfactory outcomes and improved relationships between the parties.

Legal Options for Unresolved Disputes

If the aforementioned dispute resolution methods are unsuccessful or unsuitable for the parties involved, they may choose to explore legal options to resolve the dispute. Civil litigation is the process of taking a dispute to court, where a judge or jury will decide the outcome based on the applicable laws and facts of the case.

Litigation can be a lengthy, expensive, and adversarial process, but it may be necessary for certain disputes where other alternatives have failed, or where significant issues of liability, damages, or other complex legal questions are at stake.

In some jurisdictions, parties may also have the option to pursue a small claims court proceeding for disputes of lesser monetary value or complexity. Small claims court is a simplified and expedited litigation process designed to allow parties to resolve disputes without the need for full-scale legal representation.

Regardless of the chosen dispute resolution option, it is essential for parties involved in disputes to consult with legal counsel, be aware of their rights and obligations, and consider the potential costs and benefits of pursuing various avenues for resolution.

Preventing Underpayment and Fraud

Underpayment refers to compensating less than the amount that is due, while insurance fraud involves dishonest acts committed to obtain an undeserved financial advantage. Both underpayment and fraud can have severe consequences for insurers as well as policyholders. This article discusses various types of insurance fraud, how to identify red flags that may indicate fraud, proactive steps to minimize risk, and the importance of reporting suspected fraud to the authorities.

Common Types of Insurance Fraud

Insurance fraud can be broadly categorized into two types: hard fraud and soft fraud. Hard fraud involves deliberate and premeditated actions to fake a claim or incident, while soft fraud refers to exaggerating an otherwise valid claim.

  1. Staged accidents: This is a type of hard fraud where accidents are deliberately orchestrated to deceive insurance companies. The fraudsters usually target vulnerable drivers, like the elderly, and stage a crash to make it seem as though the innocent party is at fault.

  2. Fake theft: Policyholders may falsely report items as stolen to make a claim on their insurance. In such cases, the claimant either never owned the item or has secretly disposed of it.

  3. Vehicle dumping: This type of fraud entails the owner of a car abandoning or destroying it and then reporting it as stolen to collect insurance money.

  4. Exaggerated personal injury claims: A policyholder may exaggerate the extent of their injuries following an accident to receive a larger compensation payout. This is an example of soft fraud.

  5. Misrepresenting facts during application: Policyholders may provide false or misleading information during the application process, such as underreporting their age or concealing pre-existing health conditions, to obtain a lower premium.

Red Flags that May Indicate Fraud

Detecting insurance fraud can be challenging, but there are several warning signs to watch out for:

  1. Late reporting: If a policyholder takes an unusually long time to report an accident, theft, or damage, it could be due to them fabricating a fraud scheme.

  2. Inconsistencies in the story: Fraudsters may struggle to keep their stories straight or provide conflicting information, which could be a sign that they are not being truthful.

  3. Lack of supporting evidence: A fraudulent claim may lack credible documents, like police reports, medical records, or photographs of damage.

  4. Uncooperative claimants: If a policyholder is reluctant to provide necessary information, evades questions, or refuses to cooperate with the investigation, it could be a sign of fraud.

Proactive Steps to Minimize Risk

There are various measures that insurers can implement to minimize the risk of underpayment and fraud:

  1. Conduct thorough background checks on applicants during the underwriting process.

  2. Regularly review and update risk assessment procedures to adapt to changing risk profiles.

  3. Invest in modern technologies, like artificial intelligence and data analytics, to detect patterns and anomalies in claims data.

  4. Train staff to identify potential red flags and implement fraud detection software.

  5. Ensure clear communication of policy terms and conditions to policyholders, and create a culture of transparency and accountability within the organization.

Reporting Suspected Fraud to Authorities

Reporting suspected insurance fraud is crucial in combating this criminal activity. Timely reporting can minimize financial losses, discourage future fraud attempts, and maintain public trust in the insurance industry.

Policyholders and other stakeholders are encouraged to report any suspicious activity to their insurance company or agent, as well as to the appropriate insurance regulatory body or law enforcement agency. Most countries have specific organizations dedicated to combating insurance fraud, like the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) in the United States or the Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) in the United Kingdom.

By raising awareness about the signs of fraud, taking proactive measures to minimize risk, and reporting suspicious cases, individuals and organizations can contribute to the fight against underpayment and insurance fraud, ultimately ensuring a fair and trustworthy insurance system for all.

Insurance Claims Adjustment — FAQ

1. What is an insurance claims adjuster and what is their role in the claims process?

An insurance claims adjuster is a professional who investigates, evaluates, and negotiates insurance claims on behalf of an insurance company. Their main responsibility is to determine the extent of the insurer’s liability and decide upon a fair claim settlement.

2. How long does it typically take for a claims adjuster to complete their evaluation?

The evaluation period varies depending on the complexity of the claim and the amount of information needed. Generally, it takes between a few days to a few weeks for a claims adjuster to complete their evaluation and present their findings to the insurance company.

3. Can policyholders negotiate with claims adjusters on the claim amount?

Yes, policyholders have the right to negotiate with claims adjusters. If the policyholder disagrees with the adjuster’s evaluation, they can present their evidence and negotiate for a higher settlement. It is recommended to consult an attorney or public adjuster to assist with negotiations.

4. Are claims adjusters always employed by the insurance company?

Though most claims adjusters work for insurance companies, there are independent adjusters and public adjusters as well. Independent adjusters usually work for multiple insurance companies, while public adjusters are hired by policyholders to represent their interests during the claims process.

5. What can a policyholder do if unsatisfied with the adjuster’s decision?

If the policyholder is not satisfied with the adjuster’s decision, they can request a review from the insurance company, file a complaint with their state’s department of insurance, or consult legal professionals to explore their options for further action.

Learn how to make passive income online

I've put together a free training on *How We Used The Brand New "Silver Lining Method" To Make $3k-$10k/mo (profit) With Just A Smart Phone In As Little As 8 Weeks

About the author 

Mike Vestil

Mike Vestil is an author, investor, and speaker known for building a business from zero to $1.5 million in 12 months while traveling the world.

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}